Lecture # 4 -
When Making Database of Public Information available to the Public Can Be Bad
Question
1:
Let’s
separate the two issues. First, law enforcement agencies frequently publish the
location of red-light camera programs and speed traps. Should that published
information be made available through an app to help drivers avoid getting a
ticket? Why or why not ?
In my opinion,
there is nothing wrong for the law enforcement agencies frequently publish the
location of red-light camera programs and speed traps through an app. By doing so, the road users are more alert
when passing by specific areas and eventually reduce the speed or obeying to
the traffic rules and hence reduce of the road accident rate.
The ultimate
purpose of the law enforcement agencies is to create awareness and educate
among the road users to obey the traffic rules but not with the intention of
catching as many as possible for those offended the traffic rules as their key
performance index.
The key issue is
not confined to “should’ or “should not” but is to resolve the problems in the most effective
way.
Question 2:
Second,
let’s consider location information for DUI checkpoints. If law enforcement
agencies publish this information, is it okay to have an app for drivers? Why
and why not ?
What is DUI ?
Driving under
the influence (DUI), is a crime when driving a motor vehicle with blood levels
of alcohol in excess of a legal limit.
Yes. There is no
issue of publish the information of the DUI checkpoints using an app drivers.
If the information is published by the law enforcement agencies, it indicates
that the information is meant to be shared among the public. Hence, it does not
matter to have an app because an app for drivers is just a medium to share the
information.
If law
enforcement agencies do not publish DUI checkpoint information, is it okay to
have an app that alerts drivers to those locations? Why or why not ?
In my opinion,
so long as it is not prohibited under the law, it is still okay to have an app
that alerts drivers to those locations. This is because the purpose of alerts
is to remind the drivers not to drive any vehicles when they are under any
drugs influence.
Question 3:
Many people
believe that drivers should not use a smartphone at all. Even for making phone
calls, while operating a vehicle. What kind of potential danger does this added
distraction create? How often do you drive and use your phone ? For what
purpose you use your phone ?
The potential
danger is that the driver may be not focusing in driving and it will cause road
accident. I seldom use my phone while driving. The only purpose I am using the
phone while driving is the function of Global Positioning System (GPS).
Question 4:
Isn’t the
sharing of information, such as the location of a DUI checkpoint, protected
freedom of speech by the Constitution? Can the government rally create laws to
prohibit this? On the other hand, is it ethical for drivers to share this type
of information so that a drunk driver can avoid being caught ?
Yes. Sharing of
information such as the location of a DUI checkpoint is protected freedom of
speech by the Constitution. The government has no rights to create any law to
prohibit this due to the rights are protected by the Constitution.
It must be clear that sharing of information
is nothing wrong in terms of legal and constitutional aspect. The only issue is
whether one will make proper use of the information or one will be abusing the
rights and misuse the information.
For example,
there is always a risk when driving a car on a road because there might be car
accident happening. It is very inappropriate for the government to pass a law
to prohibit the public from driving on the roads due the high accidents rate in
the country. The main solution for the problem is not to prohibit the public to
drive but to educate the public how to drive carefully.
In short, it is
not ethical for drivers to share this type of information so that a drunk
driver can avoid being caught but it is legal to share that type of
information.
Discussing information of DUI checkpoints is not bad. State DUI laws change frequently. One has to be sure that their DUI lawyer stays up to date on these issues. They involve a significant amount of scientific and physiological evidence. A friend of mine works with Los Angeles DUI attorney and often tells about changes in state DUI laws.
ReplyDelete